# Augment Code vs Kilo Code

> Augment Code: Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase
> Kilo Code: Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains and CLI with 500+ models

- Augment Code profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/augment-code
- Kilo Code profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/kilo-code
- Comparison page: https://finderatlas.com/compare/augment-code-vs-kilo-code
- Last reviewed: October 2026

## Verdict

Augment Code and Kilo Code are both Coding AI tools. Kilo Code scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.0 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by ease of use and feature depth. Only Kilo Code has a free plan or trial. Only Kilo Code is available on Windows, macOS and iOS.

### Choose Augment Code if

- You want a tool built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases.
- Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
- Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.

### Choose Kilo Code if

- You want a tool built for developers who want to choose their own models and providers, pay provider rates without markup, and keep an auditable open-source agent inside their existing IDE.
- MIT-licensed and open source, with a public GitHub repository of more than 27,000 stars.
- Access to 500+ models across 60+ providers with no stated inference markup.

## Pricing

| | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | Paid | Freemium |
| Free plan or trial | No | Yes |
| Starting price | $20 | $0 |

## Features

| Feature | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cosmos Agent Platform | Yes | Not listed |
| Automated Code Review | Yes | Not listed |
| Ticket to PR | Yes | Not listed |
| Context Engine | Yes | Not listed |
| Auggie CLI | Yes | Not listed |
| IDE Extensions | Yes | Not listed |
| Vulnerability Remediation and Incident Response | Yes | Not listed |
| MCP and Multi-Model Support | Yes | Not listed |
| Multi-Environment Agent | Not listed | Yes |
| 500+ Models | Not listed | Yes |
| Auto Model | Not listed | Yes |
| Specialised Modes | Not listed | Yes |
| MCP Support | Not listed | Yes |
| Cloud Agents and Code Review | Not listed | Yes |
| Parallel Agent Management | Not listed | Yes |
| Mobile Companion App | Not listed | Yes |
| Open Source and Transparent | Not listed | Yes |

## Platforms

| Platform | Augment Code | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | No | Yes |
| macOS | No | Yes |
| iOS | No | Yes |
| Android | No | Yes |
| API | No | No |
| Browser Extension | No | No |
| CLI | Yes | Yes |
| VS Code Extension | Yes | Yes |
| JetBrains Plugin | Yes | Yes |
| Linux | No | Yes |
| Slack App | No | Yes |

## Augment Code strengths

- Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
- Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal, so teams are not tied to one editor.
- Triggers from GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and webhooks.
- Usage pooled across up to 50 seats with no per-seat charge on Standard and Business.

## Augment Code limitations

- No free tier or trial is listed on the pricing page.
- Usage-based billing with a 40% fee on LLM spend makes monthly cost harder to predict than flat per-seat plans.
- Third-party reviews describe credit and usage pricing as confusing and a source of cost anxiety.
- Key security items (SSO, SCIM, CMEK, ISO 42001) are Enterprise-only.

## Kilo Code strengths

- MIT-licensed and open source, with a public GitHub repository of more than 27,000 stars.
- Access to 500+ models across 60+ providers with no stated inference markup.
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal, plus cloud agents, Slack and mobile.
- Supports bring-your-own-key and local models, which avoids lock-in to one provider.
- Teams plan is $15 per user per month with shared agents and analytics.

## Kilo Code limitations

- Costs are usage-based, so spend is less predictable than a flat subscription.
- A 5% processing fee applies to credit purchases.
- Trustpilot reviewers report billing and refund disputes, including an unexpected renewal charge and a declined refund on purchased credits.
- The desktop app is in beta, and some reviewers cite bugs and rate-limit issues.

## FAQ

**Is Augment Code better than Kilo Code?**

It depends on your workflow. Augment Code is built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases. Kilo Code is built for developers who want to choose their own models and providers, pay provider rates without markup, and keep an auditable open-source agent inside their existing IDE.

**What are the key feature differences between Augment Code and Kilo Code?**

Augment Code: Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase. Kilo Code: Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains and CLI with 500+ models.

**Does Augment Code or Kilo Code have a free plan?**

Kilo Code has a free plan or trial; Augment Code is paid only.

**Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Kilo Code?**

Augment Code starts at $20 and Kilo Code starts at $0. See the pricing table above for what each tier includes.