# Conductor vs Kilo Code

> Conductor: Run a team of coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace
> Kilo Code: Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains and CLI with 500+ models

- Conductor profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/conductor
- Kilo Code profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/kilo-code
- Comparison page: https://finderatlas.com/compare/conductor-vs-kilo-code
- Last reviewed: October 2026

## Verdict

Conductor and Kilo Code are both Coding AI tools. Both have a free plan or trial. Only Conductor offers an API. Only Kilo Code is available on Web, Windows and iOS.

### Choose Conductor if

- You want a tool built for running several agent tasks in parallel on one repository, reviewing agent diffs side by side, moving agent work between local and cloud workspaces.
- The Free plan covers local parallel agents with no Conductor fee.
- Supports four agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) rather than a single vendor.

### Choose Kilo Code if

- You want a tool built for developers who want to choose their own models and providers, pay provider rates without markup, and keep an auditable open-source agent inside their existing IDE.
- MIT-licensed and open source, with a public GitHub repository of more than 27,000 stars.
- Access to 500+ models across 60+ providers with no stated inference markup.

## Pricing

| | Conductor | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan or trial | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |

## Features

| Feature | Conductor | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Parallel Agents | Yes | Not listed |
| Multi-Agent Support | Yes | Not listed |
| Diff Viewer and Review | Yes | Not listed |
| Git Worktree Isolation | Yes | Not listed |
| Cloud Workspaces | Yes | Not listed |
| Multiplayer Collaboration | Yes | Not listed |
| Conductor API | Yes | Not listed |
| iOS App and Remote Control | Yes | Not listed |
| Checks | Yes | Not listed |
| Multi-Environment Agent | Not listed | Yes |
| 500+ Models | Not listed | Yes |
| Auto Model | Not listed | Yes |
| Specialised Modes | Not listed | Yes |
| MCP Support | Not listed | Yes |
| Cloud Agents and Code Review | Not listed | Yes |
| Parallel Agent Management | Not listed | Yes |
| Mobile Companion App | Not listed | Yes |
| Open Source and Transparent | Not listed | Yes |

## Platforms

| Platform | Conductor | Kilo Code |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Web | No | Yes |
| Windows | No | Yes |
| macOS | Yes | Yes |
| iOS | No | Yes |
| Android | No | Yes |
| API | Yes | No |
| Browser Extension | No | No |
| Linux | No | Yes |
| VS Code Extension | No | Yes |
| JetBrains Plugin | No | Yes |
| CLI | No | Yes |
| Slack App | No | Yes |

## Conductor strengths

- The Free plan covers local parallel agents with no Conductor fee.
- Supports four agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) rather than a single vendor.
- Git worktree isolation per task keeps concurrent agent changes separate.
- SOC 2 Type II attestation and SAML SSO/SCIM on Enterprise suit security reviews.
- Frequent releases: the changelog shows versions 0.89 to 0.91 between late September and mid-October 2026.

## Conductor limitations

- Local use is Mac-only; no Windows or Linux desktop app is listed.
- Pro at $50 per month and Teams at $60 per user per month are priced above many AI coding subscriptions, and agent usage is billed separately.
- The pricing page does not state how many cloud hours are included, and usage-based cloud pricing is planned.
- Pro Multiplayer organizations are capped at 5 Pro users.

## Kilo Code strengths

- MIT-licensed and open source, with a public GitHub repository of more than 27,000 stars.
- Access to 500+ models across 60+ providers with no stated inference markup.
- Works in VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal, plus cloud agents, Slack and mobile.
- Supports bring-your-own-key and local models, which avoids lock-in to one provider.
- Teams plan is $15 per user per month with shared agents and analytics.

## Kilo Code limitations

- Costs are usage-based, so spend is less predictable than a flat subscription.
- A 5% processing fee applies to credit purchases.
- Trustpilot reviewers report billing and refund disputes, including an unexpected renewal charge and a declined refund on purchased credits.
- The desktop app is in beta, and some reviewers cite bugs and rate-limit issues.

## FAQ

**Is Conductor better than Kilo Code?**

It depends on your workflow. Conductor is built for running several agent tasks in parallel on one repository, reviewing agent diffs side by side, moving agent work between local and cloud workspaces. Kilo Code is built for developers who want to choose their own models and providers, pay provider rates without markup, and keep an auditable open-source agent inside their existing IDE.

**What are the key feature differences between Conductor and Kilo Code?**

Conductor: Run a team of coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace. Kilo Code: Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains and CLI with 500+ models.

**Does Conductor or Kilo Code have a free plan?**

Yes, both do. Conductor is freemium and Kilo Code is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

**Which is cheaper, Conductor or Kilo Code?**

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.