# Google Stitch vs Lovart

> Google Stitch: Turn text prompts and images into app UI designs and front-end code
> Lovart: An AI design agent that turns a brief into logos, posters and campaign visuals

- Google Stitch profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/google-stitch
- Lovart profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/lovart
- Comparison page: https://finderatlas.com/compare/google-stitch-vs-lovart
- Last reviewed: October 2026

## Verdict

Google Stitch is listed under Coding AI and Lovart under Image & Visual AI. Google Stitch scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.0 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by ease of use and value for money. Both have a free plan or trial. Only Google Stitch offers an API.

### Choose Google Stitch if

- You want a tool built for fast UI ideation, turning sketches or screenshots into screens, prototyping user flows, handing designs to coding agents.
- Free to use through Google Labs, with no paid tier listed.
- Accepts both text prompts and images as starting points.

### Choose Lovart if

- You want a tool built for producing branded asset sets (logo, social posts, packaging, ad creatives) quickly from a single brief.
- Produces whole asset sets (logo, social, packaging, video) from a single brief rather than one image at a time.
- Canvas lets users edit layers, text and layout after generation.

## Pricing

| | Google Stitch | Lovart |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium |
| Free plan or trial | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |

## Features

| Feature | Google Stitch | Lovart |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prompt to UI | Yes | Not listed |
| Image to UI | Yes | Not listed |
| AI-Native Canvas | Yes | Not listed |
| Gemini-Powered Generation | Yes | Not listed |
| Prototypes | Yes | Not listed |
| DESIGN.md Design Systems | Yes | Not listed |
| Export Options | Yes | Not listed |
| MCP Server and Skills | Yes | Not listed |
| ChatCanvas | Not listed | Yes |
| Design Agent Workflow | Not listed | Yes |
| Multi-Model Generation | Not listed | Yes |
| Batch Asset Output | Not listed | Yes |
| Brand Kits | Not listed | Yes |
| Skills | Not listed | Yes |
| Memory (Arti) | Not listed | Yes |
| Delegated and Scheduled Tasks | Not listed | Yes |
| Asset Library and Clipper | Not listed | Yes |

## Platforms

| Platform | Google Stitch | Lovart |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | No | No |
| macOS | No | No |
| iOS | No | No |
| Android | No | No |
| API | Yes | No |
| Browser Extension | No | No |

## Google Stitch strengths

- Free to use through Google Labs, with no paid tier listed.
- Accepts both text prompts and images as starting points.
- Exports to Figma, AI Studio, Jules and plain HTML code.
- MCP server and DESIGN.md let coding agents build against the same design rules.
- Prototype linking turns static screens into clickable flows.

## Google Stitch limitations

- Labelled an experiment, so features, limits and availability may change without notice.
- Monthly generation caps apply, and the published figures have changed several times.
- Designs are used for model training by default unless the user opts out.
- Web-only; no dedicated desktop or mobile app was found.

## Lovart strengths

- Produces whole asset sets (logo, social, packaging, video) from a single brief rather than one image at a time.
- Canvas lets users edit layers, text and layout after generation.
- Brand Kits keep output consistent, with up to 100 kits on the top plan.
- Free plan with daily credits allows testing before paying.
- Combines several third-party models behind one interface.

## Lovart limitations

- Plan prices and credit amounts are not shown statically on the pricing page and vary between third-party sources.
- Credits expire each cycle, and heavy video or batch work can drain them quickly.
- Web only; no official mobile app or public API found.
- Top tiers cost $90 and $199 per month, which is high for individuals.

## FAQ

**Is Google Stitch better than Lovart?**

It depends on your workflow. Google Stitch is built for fast UI ideation, turning sketches or screenshots into screens, prototyping user flows, handing designs to coding agents. Lovart is built for producing branded asset sets (logo, social posts, packaging, ad creatives) quickly from a single brief.

**What are the key feature differences between Google Stitch and Lovart?**

Google Stitch: Turn text prompts and images into app UI designs and front-end code. Lovart: An AI design agent that turns a brief into logos, posters and campaign visuals.

**Does Google Stitch or Lovart have a free plan?**

Yes, both do. Google Stitch is free and Lovart is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

**Which is cheaper, Google Stitch or Lovart?**

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.