# Greptile vs Groq

> Greptile: AI code review that checks every pull request against your full codebase context
> Groq: Fast, OpenAI-compatible inference API for open models, running on custom LPU chips

- Greptile profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/greptile
- Groq profile: https://finderatlas.com/tools/groq
- Comparison page: https://finderatlas.com/compare/greptile-vs-groq
- Last reviewed: October 2026

## Verdict

Greptile is listed under Coding AI and Groq under Developer Tools. Groq scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.6 vs 8.0 out of 10). Both have a free plan or trial.

### Choose Greptile if

- You want a tool built for automated pull request review on large codebases, enforcing team coding standards, feeding review findings to coding agents.
- Reviews use a graph index of the whole repository, so findings can cover impact beyond the changed lines.
- Plain-English custom rules and learning from past pull request comments adapt reviews to team standards.

### Choose Groq if

- You want a tool built for Low-latency LLM API calls.
- Listed speeds of about 280 to 1,000 tokens per second on hosted models.
- OpenAI-compatible API and Responses API support, so migration is mostly a base URL change.

## Pricing

| | Greptile | Groq |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free plan or trial | Yes | Yes |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 |

## Features

| Feature | Greptile | Groq |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Full-Codebase Context | Yes | Not listed |
| Parallel Review Agents | Yes | Not listed |
| Custom Rules | Yes | Not listed |
| Learning from Comments | Yes | Not listed |
| Review Summaries | Yes | Not listed |
| Fix in Your Agent | Yes | Not listed |
| TREX Runtime Validation | Yes | Not listed |
| MCP Server and Claude Code Plugin | Yes | Not listed |
| Self-Hosting | Yes | Not listed |
| LPU inference | Not listed | Yes |
| OpenAI-compatible API | Not listed | Yes |
| Open model catalog | Not listed | Yes |
| Speech models | Not listed | Yes |
| Built-in tools and MCP | Not listed | Yes |
| Batch and Flex tiers | Not listed | Yes |
| Structured outputs and reasoning | Not listed | Yes |
| Spend limits and projects | Not listed | Yes |
| LoRA inference | Not listed | Yes |

## Platforms

| Platform | Greptile | Groq |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Web | Yes | Yes |
| Windows | No | No |
| macOS | No | No |
| iOS | No | No |
| Android | No | No |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Browser Extension | No | No |

## Greptile strengths

- Reviews use a graph index of the whole repository, so findings can cover impact beyond the changed lines.
- Plain-English custom rules and learning from past pull request comments adapt reviews to team standards.
- Works with GitHub, GitLab and Bitbucket, and hands findings to Claude Code, Cursor, Codex or Devin.
- Self-hosting and air-gapped deployment are available for regulated organizations.
- Free tier for one developer, free use for qualified open source, and 50% off for early startups.

## Greptile limitations

- Third-party comparisons report more false positives than some competitors; one competitor-run test claims nearly 60% of comments were nitpicks or false positives, which should be read as a rival's claim.
- Pro costs $30 per seat per month and extra credits cost $1 each, with Plus and Apex reviews using 3 and 10 credits.
- Self-hosting, SSO/SAML and GitHub Enterprise support require the custom-priced Enterprise plan.
- Focused on pull request review only; it is not an editor or coding assistant.

## Groq strengths

- Listed speeds of about 280 to 1,000 tokens per second on hosted models
- OpenAI-compatible API and Responses API support, so migration is mostly a base URL change
- Free tier with an API key, and pay-as-you-go pricing with no monthly fee
- Low per-token prices, for example $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT OSS 120B
- Includes speech-to-text and text-to-speech models alongside text models

## Groq limitations

- Only hosts a curated set of open models; no proprietary frontier models such as GPT or Claude
- Some models, including Llama 3.3 70B, are enterprise-only and require contacting sales
- Free tier rate limits are low for production use
- No public pricing page on groq.com; prices sit in the developer docs
- Preview models can be discontinued at short notice

## FAQ

**Is Greptile better than Groq?**

It depends on your workflow. Greptile is built for automated pull request review on large codebases, enforcing team coding standards, feeding review findings to coding agents. Groq is built for Low-latency LLM API calls.

**What are the key feature differences between Greptile and Groq?**

Greptile: AI code review that checks every pull request against your full codebase context. Groq: Fast, OpenAI-compatible inference API for open models, running on custom LPU chips.

**Does Greptile or Groq have a free plan?**

Yes, both do. Greptile is freemium and Groq is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

**Which is cheaper, Greptile or Groq?**

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.