Augment Code vs Conductor

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Augment Code

Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase

Paid

Visit website View details

Conductor

Run a team of coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace

Freemium

Visit website View details

Verdict

Augment Code and Conductor are both Coding AI tools. Conductor scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.0 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by ease of use and value for money. Only Conductor has a free plan or trial. Only Augment Code is available on Web, CLI and VS Code Extension. Only Conductor is available on macOS and offers an API.

Best overall

Conductor

Software Engineers
Engineering Teams
Technical Founders
Developers already using Claude Code or Codex

Choose Augment Code if

You want a tool built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases.
Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.

Choose Conductor if

You want a tool built for running several agent tasks in parallel on one repository, reviewing agent diffs side by side, moving agent work between local and cloud workspaces.
The Free plan covers local parallel agents with no Conductor fee.
Supports four agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) rather than a single vendor.

Best value: Conductor
Best for beginners: Augment Code
Best for business: Augment Code

Features

17 features compared.

Cosmos Agent Platform
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Automated Code Review
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Ticket to PR
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Context Engine
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Auggie CLI
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
IDE Extensions
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Vulnerability Remediation and Incident Response
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
MCP and Multi-Model Support
Augment Code
Available
Conductor
Not available
Parallel Agents
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Multi-Agent Support
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Diff Viewer and Review
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Git Worktree Isolation
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Cloud Workspaces
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Multiplayer Collaboration
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Conductor API
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
iOS App and Remote Control
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available
Checks
Augment Code
Not available
Conductor
Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

Pricing model
Augment Code
Paid
Conductor
Freemium
Free plan
Augment Code
No
Conductor
Yes
Starting price
Augment Code
$20
Conductor
$0
Plans
Augment Code
3 plans
Conductor
4 plans

Augment Code plans

Standard
$20/month
Small teams starting with Cosmos agents
- $20 monthly usage included
- up to 50 seats
- 50 concurrent sessions
- CLI access
- Context Engine
- code review
- pay-as-you-go top-ups
Business
$100/month
Teams with heavier agent usage
- $100 monthly usage included
- up to 50 seats
- 50 concurrent sessions
- CLI access
- Context Engine
- code review
- pay-as-you-go top-ups
Enterprise
Custom/contact sales
Large organizations needing governance and compliance
- Unlimited users
- custom usage and top-ups
- SSO
- OIDC
- SCIM
- CMEK
- ISO 42001
- unlimited concurrent sessions
- full SLA with dedicated support

Conductor plans

Free
$0
Local parallel agents on a Mac
- Run multiple coding agents in parallel
- local workspaces on your Mac
- frontier and open source models
- bring your own subscriptions and keys
Pro
Most popular
$50/month
Individuals who want cloud workspaces
- Everything in Free
- cloud workspaces
- Multiplayer with up to 5 Pro users
- Conductor API
- mobile app
Teams
$60/user/mo
Teams needing collaboration and admin controls
- Everything in Pro
- live collaboration for teams of any size
- admin portal
- centralized billing
Enterprise
Custom/custom
Organizations with security and procurement needs
- Everything in Teams
- DPA
- purchase-order billing
- SAML SSO and SCIM
- custom security and privacy settings
- SLA with dedicated support

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed October 2026.

Augment Code: 7.7overall
Conductor: 8.0overall

Augment Code leads in 1 category and Conductor in 3, with 1 tied.

Ease of Use
Conductor leads by 0.7
Augment Code
7.5
Conductor
8.2
Feature Depth
Augment Code leads by 0.2
Augment Code
8.5
Conductor
8.3
Value for Money
Conductor leads by 0.4
Augment Code
7.0
Conductor
7.4
Performance & Speed
Tied
Augment Code
8.0
Conductor
8.0
Documentation & Support
Conductor leads by 0.5
Augment Code
7.5
Conductor
8.0

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Augment Code

Pros

Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.
Works in VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal, so teams are not tied to one editor.
Triggers from GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and webhooks.
Usage pooled across up to 50 seats with no per-seat charge on Standard and Business.

Cons

No free tier or trial is listed on the pricing page.
Usage-based billing with a 40% fee on LLM spend makes monthly cost harder to predict than flat per-seat plans.
Third-party reviews describe credit and usage pricing as confusing and a source of cost anxiety.
Key security items (SSO, SCIM, CMEK, ISO 42001) are Enterprise-only.

Conductor

Pros

The Free plan covers local parallel agents with no Conductor fee.
Supports four agent CLIs (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode) rather than a single vendor.
Git worktree isolation per task keeps concurrent agent changes separate.
SOC 2 Type II attestation and SAML SSO/SCIM on Enterprise suit security reviews.
Frequent releases: the changelog shows versions 0.89 to 0.91 between late September and mid-October 2026.

Cons

Local use is Mac-only; no Windows or Linux desktop app is listed.
Pro at $50 per month and Teams at $60 per user per month are priced above many AI coding subscriptions, and agent usage is billed separately.
The pricing page does not state how many cloud hours are included, and usage-based cloud pricing is planned.
Pro Multiplayer organizations are capped at 5 Pro users.

Platforms

Web
Augment Code
Supported
Conductor
Not supported
Windows
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Not supported
macOS
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Supported
iOS
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Not supported
Android
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Not supported
API
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Supported
Browser Extension
Augment Code
Not supported
Conductor
Not supported
CLI
Augment Code
Supported
Conductor
Not supported
VS Code Extension
Augment Code
Supported
Conductor
Not supported
JetBrains Plugin
Augment Code
Supported
Conductor
Not supported

Integrations

Augment Code

5 integrations

GitHub
GitLab
Slack
Linear
Jira

Conductor

7 integrations

Claude Code
Codex
Cursor
OpenCode
GitHub
Linear
MCP

Company

Company
Augment Code
Augment Computing Inc.
Conductor
Melty Labs
Founded
Augment Code
2022
Conductor
2024
Headquarters
Augment Code
Palo Alto, CA
Conductor
San Francisco, CA
Listing
Augment Code
Claimed
Conductor
Claimed

Featured Coding AI

Picked by our editors. Not paid placement.

Frequently asked questions

Is Augment Code better than Conductor?

It depends on your workflow. Augment Code is built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases. Conductor is built for running several agent tasks in parallel on one repository, reviewing agent diffs side by side, moving agent work between local and cloud workspaces.

What are the key feature differences between Augment Code and Conductor?

Augment Code: Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase. Conductor: Run a team of coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated workspace.

Does Augment Code or Conductor have a free plan?

Conductor has a free plan or trial; Augment Code is paid only.

Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Conductor?

Augment Code starts at $20 and Conductor starts at $0. See the pricing table above for what each tier includes.

Verdict

Best overall

Choose Augment Code if

Choose Conductor if

Features

Pricing

Augment Code plans

Standard

Business

Enterprise

Conductor plans

Free

Pro

Teams

Enterprise

Our ratings

Ease of Use

Feature Depth

Value for Money

Performance & Speed

Documentation & Support

Pros and cons

Augment Code

Pros

Cons

Conductor

Pros

Cons

Platforms

Integrations

Augment Code

Conductor

Company

Featured Coding AI

v0 by Vercel

Claude

Claude Code

Related comparisons

Augment Code vs Claude

Conductor vs Claude

Augment Code vs Claude Code

Conductor vs Claude Code

Augment Code vs Cursor

Conductor vs Cursor

Frequently asked questions