FinderAtlas
Sign in

Augment Code vs Macroscope

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Augment Code logo

Augment Code

Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase

Paid
Visit websiteView details
Macroscope logo

Macroscope

AI code review, agent orchestration and engineering status updates for GitHub teams

Freemium
Visit websiteView details

Verdict

Augment Code and Macroscope are both Coding AI tools. Macroscope scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.1 vs 7.7 out of 10), led by ease of use and value for money. Only Macroscope has a free plan or trial. Only Augment Code is available on VS Code Extension and JetBrains Plugin. Only Macroscope is available on Slack App and offers an API.

Best overall

Macroscope

  • Software Engineers
  • Engineering Managers
  • Engineering Teams
  • Open Source Maintainers

Choose Augment Code if

  • You want a tool built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases.
  • Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
  • Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.

Choose Macroscope if

  • You want a tool built for Teams on GitHub that merge a high volume of PRs, including agent-written ones, and want automated review and visibility into shipped work.
  • Usage-based pricing with no per-seat fee, so cost follows review volume rather than headcount.
  • $100 in free usage for each new workspace and 1,000 free Agent credits per month.
Best value
Macroscope
Best for beginners
Augment Code
Best for business
Augment Code

Features

16 features compared.

  • Cosmos Agent Platform
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Automated Code Review
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Ticket to PR
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Context Engine
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Auggie CLI
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • IDE Extensions
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Vulnerability Remediation and Incident Response
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • MCP and Multi-Model Support
    Augment Code
    Available
    Macroscope
    Not available
  • Code Review
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Fix It For Me
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Approvability
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Check Run Agents
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Status
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Agent
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Murmur (beta)
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available
  • Macroscope CLI
    Augment Code
    Not available
    Macroscope
    Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

  • Pricing model
    Augment Code
    Paid
    Macroscope
    Freemium
  • Free plan
    Augment Code
    No
    Macroscope
    Yes
  • Starting price
    Augment Code
    $20
    Macroscope
    $0.05
  • Plans
    Augment Code
    3 plans
    Macroscope
    4 plans

Augment Code plans

  • Standard

    $20/month

    Small teams starting with Cosmos agents

    • $20 monthly usage included
    • up to 50 seats
    • 50 concurrent sessions
    • CLI access
    • Context Engine
    • code review
    • pay-as-you-go top-ups

  • Business

    $100/month

    Teams with heavier agent usage

    • $100 monthly usage included
    • up to 50 seats
    • 50 concurrent sessions
    • CLI access
    • Context Engine
    • code review
    • pay-as-you-go top-ups

  • Enterprise

    Custom/contact sales

    Large organizations needing governance and compliance

    • Unlimited users
    • custom usage and top-ups
    • SSO
    • OIDC
    • SCIM
    • CMEK
    • ISO 42001
    • unlimited concurrent sessions
    • full SLA with dedicated support

Macroscope plans

  • Code Review

    Most popular

    $0.05/KB reviewed

    Usage-based PR review, billed per KB of diff

    • 10KB minimum per review ($0.50 floor)
    • PR summaries
    • Approvability
    • custom rules
    • Fix It For Me billed as Agent credits

  • Status

    $0.05/commit

    Commit summaries and engineering status reporting

    • Commit summaries
    • areas
    • weekly digests
    • productivity stats

  • Agent

    $0.01/credit

    AI agent for codebase questions and actions

    • 1,000 free credits per month per workspace
    • Slack
    • GitHub
    • API
    • Macros

  • Enterprise

    Custom

    Contact sales for enterprise needs

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed October 2026.

Augment Code
7.7overall
Macroscope
8.1overall

Augment Code leads in 2 categories and Macroscope in 3.

  • Ease of Use

    Macroscope leads by 0.7
    Augment Code
    7.5
    Macroscope
    8.2

  • Feature Depth

    Augment Code leads by 0.1
    Augment Code
    8.5
    Macroscope
    8.4

  • Value for Money

    Macroscope leads by 0.8
    Augment Code
    7.0
    Macroscope
    7.8

  • Performance & Speed

    Augment Code leads by 0.1
    Augment Code
    8.0
    Macroscope
    7.9

  • Documentation & Support

    Macroscope leads by 0.5
    Augment Code
    7.5
    Macroscope
    8.0

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Augment Code

Pros

  • Covers the delivery loop beyond coding, with agents for PR review, ticket-to-PR, vulnerability remediation and incident response.
  • Context Engine gives agents repository-level context on large codebases.
  • Works in VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal, so teams are not tied to one editor.
  • Triggers from GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear, Jira, schedules and webhooks.
  • Usage pooled across up to 50 seats with no per-seat charge on Standard and Business.

Cons

  • No free tier or trial is listed on the pricing page.
  • Usage-based billing with a 40% fee on LLM spend makes monthly cost harder to predict than flat per-seat plans.
  • Third-party reviews describe credit and usage pricing as confusing and a source of cost anxiety.
  • Key security items (SSO, SCIM, CMEK, ISO 42001) are Enterprise-only.

Macroscope

Pros

  • Usage-based pricing with no per-seat fee, so cost follows review volume rather than headcount.
  • $100 in free usage for each new workspace and 1,000 free Agent credits per month.
  • Reviews use full-repository context rather than only the diff.
  • Covers review, auto-approval, fix PRs and status reporting under one balance.
  • Free credits available for qualified non-commercial open source projects.

Cons

  • Monthly cost is hard to predict up front because it depends on KB reviewed, commits and agent credits.
  • Documented setup is built around GitHub; no GitLab or Bitbucket support is stated.
  • Murmur is still in beta.
  • Benchmark claims of leading detection rates come from the vendor's own MacroscopeBench, not an independent test.

Platforms

  • Web
    Augment Code
    Supported
    Macroscope
    Supported
  • Windows
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • macOS
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • iOS
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • Android
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • API
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Supported
  • Browser Extension
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • CLI
    Augment Code
    Supported
    Macroscope
    Supported
  • VS Code Extension
    Augment Code
    Supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • JetBrains Plugin
    Augment Code
    Supported
    Macroscope
    Not supported
  • Slack App
    Augment Code
    Not supported
    Macroscope
    Supported

Integrations

Augment Code

5 integrations
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Slack
  • Linear
  • Jira

Macroscope

9 integrations
  • GitHub
  • Slack
  • Jira
  • Linear
  • BigQuery
  • PostHog
  • Amplitude
  • LaunchDarkly
  • Sentry

Company

  • Company
    Augment Code
    Augment Computing Inc.
    Macroscope
    Macroscope
  • Founded
    Augment Code
    2022
    Macroscope
    2023
  • Headquarters
    Augment Code
    Palo Alto, CA
    Macroscope
    San Francisco, CA
  • Listing
    Augment Code
    Claimed
    Macroscope
    Claimed

Frequently asked questions

Is Augment Code better than Macroscope?

It depends on your workflow. Augment Code is built for automating pull request review, turning tickets into tested pull requests, and working in large existing codebases. Macroscope is built for Teams on GitHub that merge a high volume of PRs, including agent-written ones, and want automated review and visibility into shipped work.

What are the key feature differences between Augment Code and Macroscope?

Augment Code: Agentic coding platform that runs code review and ticket-to-PR work on your codebase. Macroscope: AI code review, agent orchestration and engineering status updates for GitHub teams.

Does Augment Code or Macroscope have a free plan?

Macroscope has a free plan or trial; Augment Code is paid only.

Which is cheaper, Augment Code or Macroscope?

Augment Code starts at $20 and Macroscope starts at $0.05. See the pricing table above for what each tier includes.