Browser Use vs Cursor

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Browser Use logo

Browser Use

Open-source library and cloud platform for AI agents that control real web browsers

Freemium
Cursor logo

Cursor

AI coding agent and VS Code-based editor for multi-file edits and cloud agents

5.0(1 review)Freemium

Verdict

Browser Use is listed under Developer Tools and Cursor under Coding AI. Cursor scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.7 vs 8.1 out of 10). Both have a free plan or trial. Only Browser Use offers an API. Only Cursor is available on Windows, macOS and iOS.

Best overall

Cursor

  • Software engineers
  • Full-stack developers
  • Engineering teams
  • Enterprises

Choose Browser Use if

  • You want a tool built for giving AI agents reliable browser access for data extraction, form filling and multi-step web workflows.
  • MIT-licensed open-source library with a large community (about 119k GitHub stars per the site).
  • Usage-based pricing with no subscription and credits that never expire.

Choose Cursor if

  • You want a tool built for Multi-file feature work, codebase-wide refactoring, delegating tasks to background agents, reviewing pull requests.
  • Familiar VS Code-based editor with extension and keybinding support.
  • Local and cloud agents that can run in parallel on multi-file tasks.
Best for beginners
Browser Use
Best for business
Browser Use

Features

20 features compared.

  • Browser Use Agents
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Browser Infrastructure
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Open-source library
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Proxies
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Secret bindings
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Sessions, workspaces and profiles
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Recording and live preview
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Scheduled agents
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Browser Harness
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Bring your own key
    Browser Use
    Available
    Cursor
    Not available
  • Agents
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Cloud agents
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Tab and inline edits
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Codebase indexing
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Model choice
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Bugbot code review
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • CLI
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Slack app and iOS app
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Marketplace and rules
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available
  • Privacy mode
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Cursor
    Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

  • Pricing model
    Browser Use
    Freemium
    Cursor
    Freemium
  • Free plan
    Browser Use
    Yes
    Cursor
    Yes
  • Starting price
    Browser Use
    $0
    Cursor
    $0
  • Plans
    Browser Use
    3 plans
    Cursor
    7 plans

Browser Use plans

  • Free credit

    $0

    $1 one-time credit for eligible signups, no card required

    • $1 free credit
    • 10 concurrent sessions
  • Pay as you go

    Most popular

    $0.02/hour

    Usage-based cloud browsers and agents with no subscription

    • Cloud browsers at $0.02/hour
    • residential proxy $5/GB
    • agents at model cost plus 20%
    • credits never expire
  • Enterprise

    Custom/contact sales

    Higher concurrency and custom terms

    • Concurrency tiers
    • custom model API
    • zero data retention
    • SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA

Cursor plans

  • Free

    $0

    Limited usage for trying Cursor and Grok.

    • Limited usage
    • Limited chat requests
    • Limited agent requests
  • Plus

    $8/month

    Basic usage pool, Grok models only.

    • Basic shared usage pool
    • Grok models only
    • Cursor agent
    • Grok API access
  • Premium

    Most popular

    $30/month

    4x the usage of Plus, recommended for new AI users.

    • 4x Plus usage
    • Latest Grok models
    • Cloud agents and automations
    • Bugbot code reviews
    • Third-party models at API list price
  • Super

    $100/month

    15x the usage of Plus, for daily agent users.

    • 15x Plus usage
    • Everything in Premium
    • Priority model access at peak times
  • Ultra

    $200/month

    50x the usage of Plus, for power users.

    • 50x Plus usage
    • Everything in Super
    • Earliest access to new products and models
  • Teams

    $30/user/mo

    Per-seat plans with pooled admin controls; seats are Premium $30, Super $100 or Ultra $200 per user per month.

    • Premium $30
    • Super $100 or Ultra $200 seats
    • Weekly usage pool per seat
    • Centralized billing
    • Usage analytics
    • Team privacy settings
    • SAML/OIDC SSO
    • Team marketplace
  • Enterprise

    Custom/custom

    Invoicing, pooled usage and advanced security.

    • Invoice and PO billing
    • SCIM
    • Audit logs
    • Granular spend controls
    • Repository and MCP access controls
    • Priority support

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed November 2026.

Browser Use
8.1overall
Cursor
8.7overall
  • Ease of Use

    Browser Use
    7.8
    Cursor
    Not rated
  • Feature Depth

    Browser Use
    8.5
    Cursor
    Not rated
  • Value for Money

    Browser Use
    8.0
    Cursor
    Not rated
  • Performance & Speed

    Browser Use
    8.2
    Cursor
    Not rated
  • Documentation & Support

    Browser Use
    8.0
    Cursor
    Not rated
  • Inline Code Completion

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Cursor
    9.2
  • Codebase Indexing & Context

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Cursor
    9.0
  • Multi-file Agentic Edits

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Cursor
    9.3
  • IDE & Extension Compatibility

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Cursor
    9.0
  • Pricing Clarity

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Cursor
    6.8

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Browser Use

Pros

  • MIT-licensed open-source library with a large community (about 119k GitHub stars per the site).
  • Usage-based pricing with no subscription and credits that never expire.
  • Cloud browsers at $0.02/hour work with existing Playwright and Puppeteer code.
  • Python and TypeScript SDKs plus a REST API.
  • Lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and zero data retention options.

Cons

  • Usage-based billing (model cost plus 20%, browser time, proxy traffic) makes monthly costs harder to predict than a flat plan.
  • The free allowance is a one-time $1 credit, and the $5 minimum top-up is needed to unlock every model.
  • Aimed at developers; there is no consumer app and no mobile app found.
  • The site's benchmark figures are vendor-reported and not independently verified.

Cursor

Pros

  • Familiar VS Code-based editor with extension and keybinding support
  • Local and cloud agents that can run in parallel on multi-file tasks
  • Choice of models from several providers, including Cursor's own
  • Covers editor, CLI, web, Slack, iOS and PR review in one product
  • Privacy mode and SOC 2 and ISO certifications for team use

Cons

  • Third-party model usage is billed separately from the plan at API list price
  • Pricing is bundled with Grok and uses weekly usage pools, which makes costs harder to predict
  • No Android app, and the iOS app only controls local agents
  • Indexing can be heavy on very large repositories

Platforms

  • Web
    Browser Use
    Supported
    Cursor
    Supported
  • Windows
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Supported
  • macOS
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Supported
  • iOS
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Supported
  • Android
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Not supported
  • API
    Browser Use
    Supported
    Cursor
    Not supported
  • Browser Extension
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Not supported
  • Linux
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Supported
  • CLI
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Cursor
    Supported

Integrations

Browser Use

6 integrations
  • Playwright
  • Puppeteer
  • MCP
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Cursor

Cursor

4 integrations
  • GitHub
  • Slack
  • VS Code extensions
  • MCP servers

Company

  • Company
    Browser Use
    Browser Use
    Cursor
    Anysphere
  • Founded
    Browser Use
    2024
    Cursor
    Not listed
  • Headquarters
    Browser Use
    Not listed
    Cursor
    San Francisco, CA
  • Listing
    Browser Use
    Claimed
    Cursor
    Claimed

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use better than Cursor?

It depends on your workflow. Browser Use is built for giving AI agents reliable browser access for data extraction, form filling and multi-step web workflows. Cursor is built for Multi-file feature work, codebase-wide refactoring, delegating tasks to background agents, reviewing pull requests.

What are the key feature differences between Browser Use and Cursor?

Browser Use: Open-source library and cloud platform for AI agents that control real web browsers. Cursor: AI coding agent and VS Code-based editor for multi-file edits and cloud agents. Cursor is rated 5.0/5 from 1 user review.

Does Browser Use or Cursor have a free plan?

Yes, both do. Browser Use is freemium and Cursor is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

Which is cheaper, Browser Use or Cursor?

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.