Cursor vs HOL Guard

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Cursor logo

Cursor

AI coding agent and VS Code-based editor for multi-file edits and cloud agents

5.0(1 review)Freemium

Verdict

Cursor and HOL Guard are both Coding AI tools. Cursor scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.7 vs 7.8 out of 10). Both have a free plan or trial. Only Cursor is available on Web, Windows and iOS.

Best overall

Cursor

  • Software engineers
  • Full-stack developers
  • Engineering teams
  • Enterprises

Choose Cursor if

  • You want a tool built for Multi-file feature work, codebase-wide refactoring, delegating tasks to background agents, reviewing pull requests.
  • Familiar VS Code-based editor with extension and keybinding support.
  • Local and cloud agents that can run in parallel on multi-file tasks.

Choose HOL Guard if

  • You want a tool built for approving risky agent actions locally, Protecting secrets from coding agents, Reviewing MCP servers, skills and plugins before use.
  • Open source under Apache-2.0 with public code and release history.
  • Works offline with no account on the free local tier.
Best for beginners
HOL Guard
Best for business
Cursor

Features

19 features compared.

  • Agents
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Cloud agents
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Tab and inline edits
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Codebase indexing
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Model choice
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Bugbot code review
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • CLI
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Slack app and iOS app
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Marketplace and rules
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Privacy mode
    Cursor
    Available
    HOL Guard
    Not available
  • Pre-action interception
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Policy outcomes
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Local audit trail
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • MCP, skills and plugin inspection
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Layered policy
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Plugin scanner
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Risk check
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Coverage matrix
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available
  • Broad agent support
    Cursor
    Not available
    HOL Guard
    Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

  • Pricing model
    Cursor
    Freemium
    HOL Guard
    Freemium
  • Free plan
    Cursor
    Yes
    HOL Guard
    Yes
  • Starting price
    Cursor
    $0
    HOL Guard
    $0
  • Plans
    Cursor
    7 plans
    HOL Guard
    5 plans

Cursor plans

  • Free

    $0

    Limited usage for trying Cursor and Grok.

    • Limited usage
    • Limited chat requests
    • Limited agent requests
  • Plus

    $8/month

    Basic usage pool, Grok models only.

    • Basic shared usage pool
    • Grok models only
    • Cursor agent
    • Grok API access
  • Premium

    Most popular

    $30/month

    4x the usage of Plus, recommended for new AI users.

    • 4x Plus usage
    • Latest Grok models
    • Cloud agents and automations
    • Bugbot code reviews
    • Third-party models at API list price
  • Super

    $100/month

    15x the usage of Plus, for daily agent users.

    • 15x Plus usage
    • Everything in Premium
    • Priority model access at peak times
  • Ultra

    $200/month

    50x the usage of Plus, for power users.

    • 50x Plus usage
    • Everything in Super
    • Earliest access to new products and models
  • Teams

    $30/user/mo

    Per-seat plans with pooled admin controls; seats are Premium $30, Super $100 or Ultra $200 per user per month.

    • Premium $30
    • Super $100 or Ultra $200 seats
    • Weekly usage pool per seat
    • Centralized billing
    • Usage analytics
    • Team privacy settings
    • SAML/OIDC SSO
    • Team marketplace
  • Enterprise

    Custom/custom

    Invoicing, pooled usage and advanced security.

    • Invoice and PO billing
    • SCIM
    • Audit logs
    • Granular spend controls
    • Repository and MCP access controls
    • Priority support

HOL Guard plans

  • Free

    $0

    Local protection on one machine, no account required

    • Local scanning and command interception
    • On-device decisions and change diffs
    • Local policy
    • Offline support
    • Local leaked-secret scanning
  • Solo

    $4.99/month

    Personal Cloud memory across two devices

    • 2 devices
    • 30-day retention
    • 1 GB storage
    • Monitoring of up to 5 GitHub repositories
    • 250 credential validity checks per month
  • Pro

    $15/month

    Longer history and alerts for one person

    • 5 devices
    • 180-day retention
    • 5 GB storage
    • Audit log sync
    • Alert notifications
    • Policy versioning
  • Team

    $30/user/mo

    Shared policy and fleet visibility for teams

    • Up to 25 devices
    • 365-day retention
    • 25 GB plus 5 GB per seat
    • Shared policy
    • Owner queues
    • Fleet dashboards
  • Enterprise

    Custom/custom

    Identity review, evidence export and self-hosted deployment review

    • Identity and access review
    • Redacted evidence export via webhook
    • Volume pricing
    • Self-hosted or VPC deployment review

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed November 2026.

Cursor
8.7overall
HOL Guard
7.8overall

Cursor leads in 0 categories and HOL Guard in 1.

  • Inline Code Completion

    Cursor
    9.2
    HOL Guard
    Not rated
  • Codebase Indexing & Context

    Cursor
    9.0
    HOL Guard
    Not rated
  • Multi-file Agentic Edits

    Cursor
    9.3
    HOL Guard
    Not rated
  • IDE & Extension Compatibility

    Cursor
    9.0
    HOL Guard
    Not rated
  • Pricing Clarity

    HOL Guard leads by 0.4
    Cursor
    6.8
    HOL Guard
    7.2
  • Action Interception

    Cursor
    Not rated
    HOL Guard
    8.0
  • Agent Coverage

    Cursor
    Not rated
    HOL Guard
    7.8
  • Ease of Setup

    Cursor
    Not rated
    HOL Guard
    7.5
  • Transparency & Openness

    Cursor
    Not rated
    HOL Guard
    8.6

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Cursor

Pros

  • Familiar VS Code-based editor with extension and keybinding support
  • Local and cloud agents that can run in parallel on multi-file tasks
  • Choice of models from several providers, including Cursor's own
  • Covers editor, CLI, web, Slack, iOS and PR review in one product
  • Privacy mode and SOC 2 and ISO certifications for team use

Cons

  • Third-party model usage is billed separately from the plan at API list price
  • Pricing is bundled with Grok and uses weekly usage pools, which makes costs harder to predict
  • No Android app, and the iOS app only controls local agents
  • Indexing can be heavy on very large repositories

HOL Guard

Pros

  • Open source under Apache-2.0 with public code and release history
  • Works offline with no account on the free local tier
  • Lets you approve or block actions instead of only logging them
  • Covers MCP servers, skills, plugins and package installs, not just shell commands
  • Publishes a coverage matrix and states its limits openly

Cons

  • Coverage depth varies by agent and event type, and some integrations are alpha
  • Install instructions cover macOS and Linux; Windows support is not stated
  • Cloud tiers add cost, and annual prices are not listed
  • Site has no visible terms or company address on the product page

Platforms

  • Web
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • Windows
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • macOS
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Supported
  • iOS
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • Android
    Cursor
    Not supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • API
    Cursor
    Not supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • Browser Extension
    Cursor
    Not supported
    HOL Guard
    Not supported
  • Linux
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Supported
  • CLI
    Cursor
    Supported
    HOL Guard
    Supported

Integrations

Cursor

4 integrations
  • GitHub
  • Slack
  • VS Code extensions
  • MCP servers

HOL Guard

7 integrations
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Cursor
  • OpenCode
  • GitHub Copilot CLI
  • GitHub Actions
  • MCP servers

Company

  • Company
    Cursor
    Anysphere
    HOL Guard
    Hashgraph Online DAO LLC
  • Headquarters
    Cursor
    San Francisco, CA
    HOL Guard
    Not listed
  • Listing
    Cursor
    Claimed
    HOL Guard
    Claimed

Frequently asked questions

Is Cursor better than HOL Guard?

It depends on your workflow. Cursor is built for Multi-file feature work, codebase-wide refactoring, delegating tasks to background agents, reviewing pull requests. HOL Guard is built for approving risky agent actions locally, Protecting secrets from coding agents, Reviewing MCP servers, skills and plugins before use.

What are the key feature differences between Cursor and HOL Guard?

Cursor: AI coding agent and VS Code-based editor for multi-file edits and cloud agents. HOL Guard: Local approvals for AI coding agent actions before they touch your machine. Cursor is rated 5.0/5 from 1 user review.

Does Cursor or HOL Guard have a free plan?

Yes, both do. Cursor is freemium and HOL Guard is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

Which is cheaper, Cursor or HOL Guard?

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.