FinderAtlas
Sign in

Macroscope vs Zed

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Macroscope logo

Macroscope

AI code review, agent orchestration and engineering status updates for GitHub teams

Freemium
Visit websiteView details

Verdict

Macroscope and Zed are both Coding AI tools. Zed scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.5 vs 8.1 out of 10), led by value for money and performance & speed. Both have a free plan or trial. Only Macroscope is available on Web and Slack App and offers an API. Only Zed is available on Windows, macOS and Linux.

Best overall

Zed

  • Software Engineers
  • Development Teams
  • Open-Source Contributors
  • Developers who prefer lightweight native editors

Choose Macroscope if

  • You want a tool built for Teams on GitHub that merge a high volume of PRs, including agent-written ones, and want automated review and visibility into shipped work.
  • Usage-based pricing with no per-seat fee, so cost follows review volume rather than headcount.
  • $100 in free usage for each new workspace and 1,000 free Agent credits per month.

Choose Zed if

  • You want a tool built for fast native editing, running AI agents alongside a conventional editor, real-time pair programming.
  • Native Rust application designed for low-latency editing on multiple cores and the GPU.
  • Free Personal plan with unlimited use of your own API keys or external agents.
Best for beginners
Macroscope
Best for business
Macroscope

Features

17 features compared.

  • Code Review
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Fix It For Me
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Approvability
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Check Run Agents
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Status
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Agent
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Murmur (beta)
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Macroscope CLI
    Macroscope
    Available
    Zed
    Not available
  • Rust-Native Performance
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Agentic Editing
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • External Agents via ACP
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Edit Prediction
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Multiplayer Collaboration
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Debugger
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Native Git Support
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Remote Development
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available
  • Flexible Model Access
    Macroscope
    Not available
    Zed
    Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

  • Pricing model
    Macroscope
    Freemium
    Zed
    Freemium
  • Free plan
    Macroscope
    Yes
    Zed
    Yes
  • Starting price
    Macroscope
    $0.05
    Zed
    $0
  • Plans
    Macroscope
    4 plans
    Zed
    3 plans

Macroscope plans

  • Code Review

    Most popular

    $0.05/KB reviewed

    Usage-based PR review, billed per KB of diff

    • 10KB minimum per review ($0.50 floor)
    • PR summaries
    • Approvability
    • custom rules
    • Fix It For Me billed as Agent credits

  • Status

    $0.05/commit

    Commit summaries and engineering status reporting

    • Commit summaries
    • areas
    • weekly digests
    • productivity stats

  • Agent

    $0.01/credit

    AI agent for codebase questions and actions

    • 1,000 free credits per month per workspace
    • Slack
    • GitHub
    • API
    • Macros

  • Enterprise

    Custom

    Contact sales for enterprise needs

Zed plans

  • Personal

    $0

    Free editor with your own API keys or external agents

    • Unlimited use with own API keys
    • External agents
    • No hosted AI

  • Pro

    Most popular

    $10/month

    Individuals who want Zed-hosted models and edit predictions

    • Unlimited edit predictions
    • $5 hosted token credit
    • Usage billing beyond credit

  • Business

    $30/user/mo

    Teams that need AI policy and data controls

    • Org-wide AI model policies
    • Data governance controls
    • Unified spend visibility
    • Unlimited edit predictions
    • Role-based access

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed October 2026.

Macroscope
8.1overall
Zed
8.5overall

Macroscope leads in 0 categories and Zed in 2, with 3 tied.

  • Ease of Use

    Tied
    Macroscope
    8.2
    Zed
    8.2

  • Feature Depth

    Tied
    Macroscope
    8.4
    Zed
    8.4

  • Value for Money

    Zed leads by 0.8
    Macroscope
    7.8
    Zed
    8.6

  • Performance & Speed

    Zed leads by 1.4
    Macroscope
    7.9
    Zed
    9.3

  • Documentation & Support

    Tied
    Macroscope
    8.0
    Zed
    8.0

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Macroscope

Pros

  • Usage-based pricing with no per-seat fee, so cost follows review volume rather than headcount.
  • $100 in free usage for each new workspace and 1,000 free Agent credits per month.
  • Reviews use full-repository context rather than only the diff.
  • Covers review, auto-approval, fix PRs and status reporting under one balance.
  • Free credits available for qualified non-commercial open source projects.

Cons

  • Monthly cost is hard to predict up front because it depends on KB reviewed, commits and agent credits.
  • Documented setup is built around GitHub; no GitLab or Bitbucket support is stated.
  • Murmur is still in beta.
  • Benchmark claims of leading detection rates come from the vendor's own MacroscopeBench, not an independent test.

Zed

Pros

  • Native Rust application designed for low-latency editing on multiple cores and the GPU.
  • Free Personal plan with unlimited use of your own API keys or external agents.
  • Supports external agents through ACP and MCP rather than locking users to one agent.
  • Built-in multiplayer collaboration, debugger, Git and remote development.
  • Source code is public on GitHub.

Cons

  • No web or mobile version; the README lists web as not yet available.
  • Hosted AI requires a paid plan, billed at API list price plus 10%.
  • Business plan SSO, SAML and SCIM are planned but not yet available.
  • Extension library is described on the site as hundreds of extensions, so niche tooling may need workarounds.

Platforms

  • Web
    Macroscope
    Supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • Windows
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Supported
  • macOS
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Supported
  • iOS
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • Android
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • API
    Macroscope
    Supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • Browser Extension
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • CLI
    Macroscope
    Supported
    Zed
    Supported
  • Slack App
    Macroscope
    Supported
    Zed
    Not supported
  • Linux
    Macroscope
    Not supported
    Zed
    Supported

Integrations

Macroscope

9 integrations
  • GitHub
  • Slack
  • Jira
  • Linear
  • BigQuery
  • PostHog
  • Amplitude
  • LaunchDarkly
  • Sentry

Zed

9 integrations
  • Claude Agent
  • Codex
  • OpenCode
  • MCP servers
  • Language Server Protocol
  • Debug Adapter Protocol
  • Jupyter
  • Git
  • GitHub

Company

  • Company
    Macroscope
    Macroscope
    Zed
    Zed Industries
  • Founded
    Macroscope
    2023
    Zed
    2021
  • Headquarters
    Macroscope
    San Francisco, CA
    Zed
    Not listed
  • Listing
    Macroscope
    Claimed
    Zed
    Claimed

Frequently asked questions

Is Macroscope better than Zed?

It depends on your workflow. Macroscope is built for Teams on GitHub that merge a high volume of PRs, including agent-written ones, and want automated review and visibility into shipped work. Zed is built for fast native editing, running AI agents alongside a conventional editor, real-time pair programming.

What are the key feature differences between Macroscope and Zed?

Macroscope: AI code review, agent orchestration and engineering status updates for GitHub teams. Zed: A fast, Rust-built code editor for coding with teammates and AI agents.

Does Macroscope or Zed have a free plan?

Yes, both do. Macroscope is freemium and Zed is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

Which is cheaper, Macroscope or Zed?

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.