FinderAtlas
Sign in

Browser Use vs Groq

Features, pricing, ratings, and pros and cons, side by side.

Browser Use logo

Browser Use

Open-source library and cloud platform for AI agents that control real web browsers

Freemium
Visit websiteView details

Verdict

Browser Use and Groq are both Developer Tools tools. Groq scores higher in FinderAtlas's editorial review (8.6 vs 8.1 out of 10). Both have a free plan or trial.

Best overall

Groq

  • Software developers
  • AI application builders
  • Enterprise engineering teams
  • Voice and agent developers

Choose Browser Use if

  • You want a tool built for giving AI agents reliable browser access for data extraction, form filling and multi-step web workflows.
  • MIT-licensed open-source library with a large community (about 119k GitHub stars per the site).
  • Usage-based pricing with no subscription and credits that never expire.

Choose Groq if

  • You want a tool built for Low-latency LLM API calls.
  • Listed speeds of about 280 to 1,000 tokens per second on hosted models.
  • OpenAI-compatible API and Responses API support, so migration is mostly a base URL change.
Best for beginners
Groq
Best for business
Browser Use

Features

19 features compared.

  • Browser Use Agents
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Browser Infrastructure
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Open-source library
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Proxies
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Secret bindings
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Sessions, workspaces and profiles
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Recording and live preview
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Scheduled agents
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Browser Harness
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • Bring your own key
    Browser Use
    Available
    Groq
    Not available
  • LPU inference
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • OpenAI-compatible API
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Open model catalog
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Speech models
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Built-in tools and MCP
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Batch and Flex tiers
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Structured outputs and reasoning
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • Spend limits and projects
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available
  • LoRA inference
    Browser Use
    Not available
    Groq
    Available

Pricing

Plans as listed by each vendor. Check their sites for current prices.

  • Pricing model
    Browser Use
    Freemium
    Groq
    Freemium
  • Free plan
    Browser Use
    Yes
    Groq
    Yes
  • Starting price
    Browser Use
    $0
    Groq
    $0
  • Plans
    Browser Use
    3 plans
    Groq
    3 plans

Browser Use plans

  • Free credit

    $0

    $1 one-time credit for eligible signups, no card required

    • $1 free credit
    • 10 concurrent sessions

  • Pay as you go

    Most popular

    $0.02/hour

    Usage-based cloud browsers and agents with no subscription

    • Cloud browsers at $0.02/hour
    • residential proxy $5/GB
    • agents at model cost plus 20%
    • credits never expire

  • Enterprise

    Custom/contact sales

    Higher concurrency and custom terms

    • Concurrency tiers
    • custom model API
    • zero data retention
    • SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA

Groq plans

  • Free

    $0

    Free API access with lower rate limits, for evaluation and small projects

    • API key from the console
    • Access to hosted open models
    • Playground
    • Lower rate limits than the Developer tier

  • Developer

    Most popular

    $0.075-$4.00/1M tokens

    Pay-as-you-go usage billing with higher rate limits, no monthly fee

    • Higher rate limits
    • Chat support
    • Flex service tier
    • Batch processing
    • Spend limits

  • Enterprise

    Custom/custom

    Contact sales for dedicated capacity and enterprise-only models

    • Custom rate limits
    • Models such as Llama 3.3 70B
    • Dedicated infrastructure
    • Enterprise controls

Our ratings

Scored out of 10 by the Finder Atlas editorial team. Last reviewed October 2026.

Browser Use
8.1overall
Groq
8.6overall

  • Ease of Use

    Browser Use
    7.8
    Groq
    Not rated

  • Feature Depth

    Browser Use
    8.5
    Groq
    Not rated

  • Value for Money

    Browser Use
    8.0
    Groq
    Not rated

  • Performance & Speed

    Browser Use
    8.2
    Groq
    Not rated

  • Documentation & Support

    Browser Use
    8.0
    Groq
    Not rated

  • Inference Speed

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Groq
    9.5

  • Latency

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Groq
    9.2

  • API Compatibility

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Groq
    9.0

  • Cost Efficiency

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Groq
    8.5

  • Model Selection

    Browser Use
    Not rated
    Groq
    7.0

Scores weigh documented features, plan value, platform coverage, integrations and user feedback. A missing score means we have not rated that area yet.

Pros and cons

Browser Use

Pros

  • MIT-licensed open-source library with a large community (about 119k GitHub stars per the site).
  • Usage-based pricing with no subscription and credits that never expire.
  • Cloud browsers at $0.02/hour work with existing Playwright and Puppeteer code.
  • Python and TypeScript SDKs plus a REST API.
  • Lists SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and zero data retention options.

Cons

  • Usage-based billing (model cost plus 20%, browser time, proxy traffic) makes monthly costs harder to predict than a flat plan.
  • The free allowance is a one-time $1 credit, and the $5 minimum top-up is needed to unlock every model.
  • Aimed at developers; there is no consumer app and no mobile app found.
  • The site's benchmark figures are vendor-reported and not independently verified.

Groq

Pros

  • Listed speeds of about 280 to 1,000 tokens per second on hosted models
  • OpenAI-compatible API and Responses API support, so migration is mostly a base URL change
  • Free tier with an API key, and pay-as-you-go pricing with no monthly fee
  • Low per-token prices, for example $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens for GPT OSS 120B
  • Includes speech-to-text and text-to-speech models alongside text models

Cons

  • Only hosts a curated set of open models; no proprietary frontier models such as GPT or Claude
  • Some models, including Llama 3.3 70B, are enterprise-only and require contacting sales
  • Free tier rate limits are low for production use
  • No public pricing page on groq.com; prices sit in the developer docs
  • Preview models can be discontinued at short notice

Platforms

  • Web
    Browser Use
    Supported
    Groq
    Supported
  • Windows
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Groq
    Not supported
  • macOS
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Groq
    Not supported
  • iOS
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Groq
    Not supported
  • Android
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Groq
    Not supported
  • API
    Browser Use
    Supported
    Groq
    Supported
  • Browser Extension
    Browser Use
    Not supported
    Groq
    Not supported

Integrations

Browser Use

6 integrations
  • Playwright
  • Puppeteer
  • MCP
  • Claude Code
  • Codex
  • Cursor

Groq

8 integrations
  • OpenAI SDK
  • Factory Droid
  • OpenCode
  • Kilo Code
  • Roo Code
  • Cline
  • Google Workspace
  • MCP connectors

Company

  • Company
    Browser Use
    Browser Use
    Groq
    Groq LLC
  • Founded
    Browser Use
    2024
    Groq
    2016
  • Headquarters
    Browser Use
    Not listed
    Groq
    San Francisco, CA
  • Listing
    Browser Use
    Claimed
    Groq
    Claimed

Frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use better than Groq?

It depends on your workflow. Browser Use is built for giving AI agents reliable browser access for data extraction, form filling and multi-step web workflows. Groq is built for Low-latency LLM API calls.

What are the key feature differences between Browser Use and Groq?

Browser Use: Open-source library and cloud platform for AI agents that control real web browsers. Groq: Fast, OpenAI-compatible inference API for open models, running on custom LPU chips.

Does Browser Use or Groq have a free plan?

Yes, both do. Browser Use is freemium and Groq is freemium, and each has a free plan or trial.

Which is cheaper, Browser Use or Groq?

Both can be used for free. Paid plans differ in limits and features, so compare the tiers in the pricing table above.